Some patterns I noticed about the American way of life are, citizens are obliviously dependent authority. Americans depend on the government to be in control of our health care system even though those companies are trying their best to get as much money our of citizens as possible. Americas also depend on the doctors to make us feel better and women especially depend on doctors to deliver their babies even though, like the health care systems, they try to get money out of you by rushing through procedure in an unnatural way so the doctors get a chance to see more patients. Finally, in the American way of food, we highly depend on the factories that produce our food so we have have it as immediately as possible even though the way the animals and plants are treated are filled with chemicals, pesticides, and hormones. The general American way of life is like a factory, there is a certain procedure that needs to be conducted in order to save lots of time and money.
One main aspect of poverty in America we have looked at is the health care system in America and how it contrasts with other countries, more specifically looking at Canada, France, and England. The health care system has its benefits in Canada and France that contrast with the American health care system.
Michael Moore's SiCKO is a movie about those in Ameirca who have health insurance. It basically talks about how the insurance companies try to get as much money out of citizens as they can. And they compare this to other countries. In America, doctors are paid more if they deny care to patients from the insurance company to cover because they are saving the insurance company's money. While in England, the doctors get paid the more they convince their patients to stop smoking, the more they actually help their patients. It is also shows in statistics that people in England will live longer and are healthier than Americans due to the health care difference in both countries. They say the poorest person in England will live longer than the richest person in America because of the "factory"-like lives we live which are unnatural and unsustainable.
SiCKO shows a case where a man needed surgery in order to save his life, all he had to do was get the surgery approved by the hospital. But because the insurance companies need to deny services to save their money, the doctor had to deny this service which caused his death. Another case where an American woman had to pretend she was related to a canadian man so she would be able to get free health care in Canada.
The movie also compares how America is a really stressful country where there's barely a break, school for the first 20 some years of our lives, get a job with might not cover all your needs causing more stress, and because you are stressed you need to buy antidepressants and then you're thousands of dolllars in debt (like a factory). In France, after a man was treated, the doctor asked him if he was ready for another job and he was able to take three months off from work while still getting money (he doesn't even have to pay for his visit to the hospital or the ride he took to get there) and relax before he starts working again.
When sharing our personal experiences with the class, one of the students (Lauren 4/20) explained how one of her family memebers was denied care and was upset about it but did not want to show it as did another student, Binta. We noticed that we did not express our anger freely because we simply concluded that there was nothing we could do about it. This came up in SiCKO where a French man explained the the French government is afriad of the people because they have the power to protest and get free medical care. But in the United States people are afraid of the government because in the case of medical care they control the treatments you get and the care you get, and just your well being overall. Because they have this control we just accept that there's nothing we can do about it. This is also a general pattern I notice about the American way of life, because we depend so much on our authority which has so much power, we fear the power that they have and hold back on what we say despite our "Freedom of Speech" in the U.S.
In America the “normal” way of a woman giving birth is as shown in the media; the woman’s water breaks she rushes to the hospital, goes to the emergency room, gets an epidural so she doesn’t feel the pain, the baby is born and taken away for tests and such and once the baby is back it’s a happy ending. Another version of this story is that she gets an epidural, then some pitosin, the woman cannot give birth at this point, and the doctor saves the day by performing a c-section, and the mother and the baby make it through alive. These stories are flawed because of American's dependancy of the authorities in society.
The film "Business of Being Born," is a very revealing one. It lets viewers in on the differences between home births and hospital births. In modern day America we have techniques and technologies to aid child birth unnecessarily such as machines, vacuums, forceps, epidurals, episiotomies, and of course, c-sections which make the OB's life less complicated whereas most people think the doctor cares about the patient because that's what they are supposed to do but the patients are seen more as victims than as patients. In Shira’s birth experience, she felt that her home birth was simple and she did not need to be taken care of by a doctor or the techniques or technologies they use. Also very much like a factory.
Most would think doctors are people patients can depend on but because they believe they are the authority figure during child birth, the one in control (because the citizens are so dependent of them, they take advantage of the power that they have), they can do whatever they want even if it goes against what you want them to do. Because the doctor is getting paid to do what he/she is doing, they will plan to do it the way they want it. What they are doing is a form of commodity, they have to do what they have to do in a certain amount of time, and the doctors make sure the baby is born at a certain time by using techniques and technologies that are not necessarily good for the patient but efficient and convenient for the doctor. This means that if it is convenient for them to do a c-section, when it is not even completely necessary for them to, rather than risk something going wrong during child labor and being blamed for it, they’ll do it. (Rubin). When Melissa, a teacher who works at School of the Future shared her birth story she explained how she did not want an episiotomy but the doctor gave it to her anyway without consulting her. The “Normal” way of birth is in the hands of the doctor who would take advantage of that power if he wanted to speed up the process. Doctors are not as trustworthy as they seem in the ideal American way of birth because of their abuse of power and greed for money (for most doctors).
Once the child is born, as shown in the Monty Python youtube video, the child is taken away from the mother for "tests," again like a factory treating the baby as a product, not a living being. Because this happens, it takes away that mother vs. child connection that they have at child birth. For example with the dolphin giving birth, naturally, once the calf is born, the two swam together side by side. And the doctors take away that connection. Similar to a woman that I know gave birth twice, once in another country and once in America, in the other country, after giving birth she was able to hold her child and her experience of holding her baby just after her child was born was one she enjoyed. And unlike how the American way of birth is, she was able to take care of her child in the hospital with the child lying next to her. She did not get that experience with her second child, to whom she gave birth in America because the doctors took away the child once they were born. The birth experience in America has become controlled and unnatural
In the case of a natural child birth such as the dolphin's or giraffe's, no meds were necessary. Once the calf was born, they would learn to swim/stand up with their mother by their side. Contrasting with a normal child birth in America where the doctors are in control of the birth and does not allow the woman's body or the woman's baby to act as it naturally should. The doctors give the woman an episiotomy when, according to Gaskin, the cervix does not need to be mangled with because it acts as a sphincter, allowing to open and close as necessary. Gaskin also mentioned that sphincters are "shy" when the woman is disturbed during child birth the sphincter will close up. So when people are walking in and out of the room, and there are bright lights focusing on the woman, it is harder for the woman to feel comfortable pushing the baby out, which is where the meds come in. Controlling the sphincter is a mind-body connection where if the woman is relaxed, her sphincter is more likely to open up more easily whereas, if she's in a hospital where people are yelling at her to push, its less likely that she will feel comfortable and allow her sphincter to open up. The doctors make the experience for the woman artificial and it affects the woman's body. The ideal American way of birth gives the woman’s body stimulants that deprive the woman of empowerment from giving birth naturally.
As we see in the media in America today, most if not all births take place in a hospital where there is a doctor in charge delivering the birth. Based on youtube videos of a giraffe giving birth, a dolphin giving birth, Ina May Gaskin’s interview, video, and article, a Monty Python youtube video, an article about c-sections, and other birth stories, we can conclude that the typical American way of birth is highly flawed because it portrays doctors as trustworthy heroes and midwives as evil women, it takes away the woman’s empowerment, connection with her child, it takes away an experience that should be personal if she wants it to be, and it has bad after affects on the woman once she has given birth. Not only is the child treated like a product but the mother is too.
In the American way of food Industrialization helps speed up the process of producing mass amounts of food. The movie, "Vroom! Farming For Kids" shows how farming has been industrialized. Extreme machines are used to pick crops and tend the farm where there is little work for a lot of food at a fast pace resulting in lots of profit. But replacing people with machinery used by fossil fuels polluting the air as said in the article. The article, "Industrial Food is Cheap," states that the pesticids and hormones used to produce the 'best' kind of food is an input to the cancer epidemic. Whereas, if organic foods were produced, that would elimilate the use of chemicals thus decreasing the disease rate. Industrialized food is NOT cheap because although it is cheap in money, in the long run it affects the planet and all the hormones used affects us Americans who eat the food leading to risk of diseases. Food companies are willing to risk the health of humans and the well being of our planet in order to gain profit. Food in a very literal sense is produced in a factory, like the American way of life.
The video, "Meatrix" is about a pig who does not know the way he is being mistreated and what is going to happen. A cow, Moofius, informs him that the life he thought was decent is actually very cruel and will lead him to his death to be turned into a burger. "Family farm is just a fantasy," animals are not being treated like the ideal farm, raising their animals with care. The animals in industrialized farms never see sunlight or even touch ground, they are kept in small tightly confined cages to then be killed and slaughtered, 5000 cows are slaughtered per day so corporations can gain profits.
In the video where Pollan is a guest on the Colbert show on comedy central, the discussion is basically an argument between Colbert, the typical American, and Pollan who is against food corporations and food processing. As Pollan suggested that a healthy meal would be something home cooked, while Colbert replied, are you trying to "undream the dream"? implying that the general American dream (in the case of food) is to have your food already prepared so life can be more convenient for us so we do not have to spend time making the food. Americans depend on food companies to produce their food cheap and fast to have their food accessible. The media in the United States convinces citizens that the ability to get food fast and easy is good because it is cheap and accessible. The media manipulating citizens helps companies gain profit.
Overall in the American way of birth, food, and poverty, citizens depend on the authority figures to make lives more convenient, fast, and easy. These descriptions are similar to a factory. There is strict procedure to go by in order to increase profits. Similar in the American way of life, the norm is to get an education and get a job to increase profits. But also the every day factors of our lives like food are factory like.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Monday, June 8, 2009
Collapse Assignment #2
As shown in the Easter Island Chapter of Jared Diamond's book, their deforestation eliminated a main resource. As the trees started out as an abundant resource, as time passed, their forrests got smaller, this was a main cause of the society's collapse. Similar to America's use of oil, it used to be that for every gallon used, hundreds would be produced but they declined and now we are losing energy. We depend so much on oil, it will most likely be a factor of the collapse of America.
Based on my own experiences, I notice adults talking about politics and oil is a reoccuring topic I'm wondering how many people are aware of it? I also wonder, of those who are aware of the decline of oil leading to the possible collapse of American society, have any incentive to come up with an alternative before it is too late. It seems to me that most Americans just accept that bad things will happen, or they assume that someone of higher power will take care of it (government)thinking that average American citizen is incapable of making a change.
When looking at other people's blogs about this assignment. I noticed Jacara's and she included a quote that really caught my attention that said "maybe when bombs start going off here, then people will listen" from the movie, Across the Universe. I agree with this quote, Americans tend to procrastonate, they put things off until there has been a drastic change directly affecting the citizens. As far as I know, nothing dramatic is being done about the decline of oil and I think once we start losing our fast food or other conveniences in our lives, that's when people will begin to want to do something. And connecting this point with mine, even when it comes to the point where our lives are in danger, people will still want to depend on the government or "the experts" to take charge which I don't think they will do successfully so late in the game.
Based on my own experiences, I notice adults talking about politics and oil is a reoccuring topic I'm wondering how many people are aware of it? I also wonder, of those who are aware of the decline of oil leading to the possible collapse of American society, have any incentive to come up with an alternative before it is too late. It seems to me that most Americans just accept that bad things will happen, or they assume that someone of higher power will take care of it (government)thinking that average American citizen is incapable of making a change.
When looking at other people's blogs about this assignment. I noticed Jacara's and she included a quote that really caught my attention that said "maybe when bombs start going off here, then people will listen" from the movie, Across the Universe. I agree with this quote, Americans tend to procrastonate, they put things off until there has been a drastic change directly affecting the citizens. As far as I know, nothing dramatic is being done about the decline of oil and I think once we start losing our fast food or other conveniences in our lives, that's when people will begin to want to do something. And connecting this point with mine, even when it comes to the point where our lives are in danger, people will still want to depend on the government or "the experts" to take charge which I don't think they will do successfully so late in the game.
Sunday, June 7, 2009
Collapse Assignment 1
I thought it was interesting how the society started off without industrialization and without domestication of animals and yet they were still able to build as many statues as they did soely on the people that they had. I think it just goes to show how lazy we are as Americans, I think this point was clearly defined before but in comparison to Easter Island, we replace the majority of our people with machinery and animals for our own convenience.
After reading the chapter I deffinately see the similarities between American civilization and Easter Island's. The collapse of Easter Island was due to environmental impacts, political, social, and religious factors, and competition between clans. Seen in American way of food, we use a lot of resources that we have that are not sustainable. So the resources we use today we might not have years from now because of environmental impacts. Also comparing the way we pollute our air and water with our waste. There is also lots of politicial conflicts with how to deal with our economic situation right now. And lastly, America is competiting with other countries for techonology and resources.
I think the general significance of the chapter was to see how Easter Island went downshill and compare it to the path that America is in.
After reading the chapter I deffinately see the similarities between American civilization and Easter Island's. The collapse of Easter Island was due to environmental impacts, political, social, and religious factors, and competition between clans. Seen in American way of food, we use a lot of resources that we have that are not sustainable. So the resources we use today we might not have years from now because of environmental impacts. Also comparing the way we pollute our air and water with our waste. There is also lots of politicial conflicts with how to deal with our economic situation right now. And lastly, America is competiting with other countries for techonology and resources.
I think the general significance of the chapter was to see how Easter Island went downshill and compare it to the path that America is in.
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Final Food Paper:
The American way of food is generally easy access food for cheap. The media manipulates citizens into thinking fast and convenient food is good but really the food we eat comes from the industrialized farms and the mistreated animals. Food corporations will go to extreme lengths to maximize profit.
Industrialization helps speed up the process of producing mass amounts of food. The movie, "Vroom! Farming For Kids" shows how farming has been industrialized. Extreme machines are used to pick crops and tend the farm where there is little work for a lot of food at a fast pace resulting in lots of profit. But replacing people with machinery used by fossiln fuels polluting the air as said in the article. The article, "Industrial Food is Cheap," states that the pesticids and hormones used to produce the 'best' kind of food is an input to the cancer epidemic. Whereas, if organic foods were produced, that would elimilate the use of chemicals thus decreasing the disease rate. Industrialized food is NOT cheap because although it is cheap in money, in the long run it affects the planet and all the hormones used affects us Americans who eat the food leading to risk of diseases. Food companies are willing to risk the health of humans and the well being of our planet in order to gain profit.
In "Unser Taglich Brot" (our daily bread) shows how fruits produced through industrialization. They are grown in a controlled environment so the apples do not get dirty and once they are picked they go straight to the factory to get packaged, then shipped to the grocery stores. As opposed to the natural way apples are grown in a natural environment including all the parts of the ecosystem which are apart of their natural production. Capitalism forces corporations to industrialize America's production of food to increase profits.
The video, "Meatrix" is about a pig who does not know the way he is being mistreated and what is going to happen. A cow, Moofius, informs him that the life he thought was decent is actually very cruel and will lead him to his death to be turned into a burger. "Family farm is just a fantasy," animals are not being treated like the ideal farm, raising their animals with care. The animals in industrialized farms never see sunlight or even touch ground, they are kept in small tightly confined cages to then be killed and slaughtered, 5000 cows are slaughtered per day so corporations can gain profits.
The way this is conveyed in the video "Cows with guns," is that they animals "eat to grow, grow to die." In this video, the cows try to rebel and escape so they can be free and they say, "We will run free with the buffalo or die," because cows probably do not know that there exists a better life than they are living, they do not get to make that decision so they are forced to eat and live in their own manure. Because farms tending animals incompetently, the manure (12 million pounds of it) is not being taken care of and is leaking into rivers causing water pollution. Food corporations will pollute the water and abuse the animals if that is what it takes to maximize profits.
In the Coalition of Immokalee workers, the migrant farm workers are being treated unfairly as well. Because they are immigrants, they do not get paid very much and have little to no power, so they are forced to work tomato picking. Companies take advantage of migrant workers and expoit them to gain profits.
Grocery stores, which are chains from food corporations, tend to push foods that taste or look good to the consumer meaning food with sugars, salts, and fats, these are the general ingredients in products that react with the human body to make you want more salty, fatty, sugary foods. In the snacks aisle, the chocolate chip cookies were at eye level for customers to see while the saltine crackers were at the bottom. And in the fruits and vegetable sections the fruits had to look shiny, colorful, and appealing. The food corporations use advertisement strategies to manipulate food buyers to buy more food to get more money.
In the video where Pollan is a guest on the Colbert show on comedy central, the discussion is basically an argument between Colbert, the typical American, and Pollan who is against food corporations and food processing. As Pollan suggested that a healthy meal would be something home cooked, while Colbert replied, are you trying to "undream the dream"? implying that the generl American dream (in the case of food) is to have your food already prepared so life can be more convenient for us so we do not have to spend time making the food. The media in the United States convinces citizens that the ability to get food fast and easy is good because it is cheap and accessible. The media manipulating citizens helps companies gain profit.
Shown in movies, "Vroom!...," "Unser Taglich Brot," videos, "Meatrix," "Cows With Guns," "Pollan vs Colbert," article "Industrialized Food is Cheap," and what I have learned about grocery stores, fast food places and CIW, food corporations go to great lengths to make profit through industrialization, animal cruelty, and manipulation.
Industrialization helps speed up the process of producing mass amounts of food. The movie, "Vroom! Farming For Kids" shows how farming has been industrialized. Extreme machines are used to pick crops and tend the farm where there is little work for a lot of food at a fast pace resulting in lots of profit. But replacing people with machinery used by fossiln fuels polluting the air as said in the article. The article, "Industrial Food is Cheap," states that the pesticids and hormones used to produce the 'best' kind of food is an input to the cancer epidemic. Whereas, if organic foods were produced, that would elimilate the use of chemicals thus decreasing the disease rate. Industrialized food is NOT cheap because although it is cheap in money, in the long run it affects the planet and all the hormones used affects us Americans who eat the food leading to risk of diseases. Food companies are willing to risk the health of humans and the well being of our planet in order to gain profit.
In "Unser Taglich Brot" (our daily bread) shows how fruits produced through industrialization. They are grown in a controlled environment so the apples do not get dirty and once they are picked they go straight to the factory to get packaged, then shipped to the grocery stores. As opposed to the natural way apples are grown in a natural environment including all the parts of the ecosystem which are apart of their natural production. Capitalism forces corporations to industrialize America's production of food to increase profits.
The video, "Meatrix" is about a pig who does not know the way he is being mistreated and what is going to happen. A cow, Moofius, informs him that the life he thought was decent is actually very cruel and will lead him to his death to be turned into a burger. "Family farm is just a fantasy," animals are not being treated like the ideal farm, raising their animals with care. The animals in industrialized farms never see sunlight or even touch ground, they are kept in small tightly confined cages to then be killed and slaughtered, 5000 cows are slaughtered per day so corporations can gain profits.
The way this is conveyed in the video "Cows with guns," is that they animals "eat to grow, grow to die." In this video, the cows try to rebel and escape so they can be free and they say, "We will run free with the buffalo or die," because cows probably do not know that there exists a better life than they are living, they do not get to make that decision so they are forced to eat and live in their own manure. Because farms tending animals incompetently, the manure (12 million pounds of it) is not being taken care of and is leaking into rivers causing water pollution. Food corporations will pollute the water and abuse the animals if that is what it takes to maximize profits.
In the Coalition of Immokalee workers, the migrant farm workers are being treated unfairly as well. Because they are immigrants, they do not get paid very much and have little to no power, so they are forced to work tomato picking. Companies take advantage of migrant workers and expoit them to gain profits.
Grocery stores, which are chains from food corporations, tend to push foods that taste or look good to the consumer meaning food with sugars, salts, and fats, these are the general ingredients in products that react with the human body to make you want more salty, fatty, sugary foods. In the snacks aisle, the chocolate chip cookies were at eye level for customers to see while the saltine crackers were at the bottom. And in the fruits and vegetable sections the fruits had to look shiny, colorful, and appealing. The food corporations use advertisement strategies to manipulate food buyers to buy more food to get more money.
In the video where Pollan is a guest on the Colbert show on comedy central, the discussion is basically an argument between Colbert, the typical American, and Pollan who is against food corporations and food processing. As Pollan suggested that a healthy meal would be something home cooked, while Colbert replied, are you trying to "undream the dream"? implying that the generl American dream (in the case of food) is to have your food already prepared so life can be more convenient for us so we do not have to spend time making the food. The media in the United States convinces citizens that the ability to get food fast and easy is good because it is cheap and accessible. The media manipulating citizens helps companies gain profit.
Shown in movies, "Vroom!...," "Unser Taglich Brot," videos, "Meatrix," "Cows With Guns," "Pollan vs Colbert," article "Industrialized Food is Cheap," and what I have learned about grocery stores, fast food places and CIW, food corporations go to great lengths to make profit through industrialization, animal cruelty, and manipulation.
Monday, June 1, 2009
Final Food Paper Rough Draft
Thesis: Food corporations will go to extreme lengths to maximize profits:
Within the past week in class we have been watching "Unser Taglich Brot" (our daily bread) and "Vroom! Farming For Kids," discussing where the food we eat comes from. Also shown in "The Meatrix" 1, 2, and 2.5 and the article "Industrial Food is Cheap," the general American way of food is uhealthy and cruel to Animals and plants.
The media in the United States convinces citizens that the ability to get food fast and easy is good because it is cheap and easy to get access to. We've seen in "Vroom!..." how farming has been industrialized. Extreme machines are used to pick crops and tend the farm where there is little work for a lot of food at a fast pace resulting in lots of profit. But replacing people with machinery used by fossiln fuels polluting the air as said in the article "Industrial Food is Cheap." Also stated in this article, because farms tending animals incompetently, the manure (12 million pounds of it) is not being taken care of and is leaking into rivers causing water pollution. This article's main argument is that Industrialized food is NOT cheap because although it is cheap in money, in the long run it affects the planet and all the hormones used affects us Americans who eat the food leading to risk of diseases. And in "Unser Taglich Brot" what is done to animals for our convenience where pigs, chickens, and cows suffer from this immediately, us humans have to face health problems and pollution problems. Whereas, if we eat organic food, although it is expencive money wise, it eliminates the use of chemicals devreasing the risk of diseases which helps us in the long run. Food corporations are willing to risk the health of citizens, and the well being of our planet, and manipulate American citizens in order to gain money.
Shown in "The Meatrix" series, the "Family farm is just a fantasy," animals are not being treated like the ideal farm, raising their animals with care. The animals in industrialized farms never see sunlight or even touch ground, they are kept in small tightly confined cages to then be killed and slaughtered, 5000 cows are slaughtered per day so corporations can gain profits.
Grocery stores which are chaings from food corporations tend to push foods that taste or look good to the consumer meaning food with sugars, salts, and fats, these are the general ingredients in products that react with the human body to make you want more salty, fatty, sugary foods. Even fruit grocery stores try to make it look most pleasing to the consumer. In the snacks aisle the chocolate chip cookies were at eye level for customers to see while the saltine crackers were at the bottom. And in the fruits and vegetable sections the fruits had to look shiny, colorful, and appealing.
In Pollan's book, he addresses the point that Americans are easily convinced when dieting. Because we are not educated enough about these things that we face in our everyday lives, we turn to the "experts" who
My initial thought about this question would be that healthy food is what we've been told since we were younger, fruits and vegetables. But according to foodasfood.com, each vitamin, vegetable, fruit, etc. has its advantages and disadvantages. One food can be good for one thing but bad for another. The example used was, a little alcohol will prevent heart attacks but maybe cause breast cancer. We can't know for sure because everyone's body has different reaction to something. From this I concluded that the definition for food that is good for you can vary for different people.
All of this is very messy and choppy because I had trouble organizing my thoughs so I came up with an outline trying to include everything I can use here:
Intro
Argument#1: Industrialization
-->Vroom!...
-->Our Daily Bread (factory examples)
-->"Industrial Food Is Cheap"
Argument#2: Animal Cruelty
-->Meatrix
-->Cows With Guns
Argument#3: Media/Manipulation
-->Grocery Stores
-->Fast Food
-->Pollan vs Colbert
Conclusion
Within the past week in class we have been watching "Unser Taglich Brot" (our daily bread) and "Vroom! Farming For Kids," discussing where the food we eat comes from. Also shown in "The Meatrix" 1, 2, and 2.5 and the article "Industrial Food is Cheap," the general American way of food is uhealthy and cruel to Animals and plants.
The media in the United States convinces citizens that the ability to get food fast and easy is good because it is cheap and easy to get access to. We've seen in "Vroom!..." how farming has been industrialized. Extreme machines are used to pick crops and tend the farm where there is little work for a lot of food at a fast pace resulting in lots of profit. But replacing people with machinery used by fossiln fuels polluting the air as said in the article "Industrial Food is Cheap." Also stated in this article, because farms tending animals incompetently, the manure (12 million pounds of it) is not being taken care of and is leaking into rivers causing water pollution. This article's main argument is that Industrialized food is NOT cheap because although it is cheap in money, in the long run it affects the planet and all the hormones used affects us Americans who eat the food leading to risk of diseases. And in "Unser Taglich Brot" what is done to animals for our convenience where pigs, chickens, and cows suffer from this immediately, us humans have to face health problems and pollution problems. Whereas, if we eat organic food, although it is expencive money wise, it eliminates the use of chemicals devreasing the risk of diseases which helps us in the long run. Food corporations are willing to risk the health of citizens, and the well being of our planet, and manipulate American citizens in order to gain money.
Shown in "The Meatrix" series, the "Family farm is just a fantasy," animals are not being treated like the ideal farm, raising their animals with care. The animals in industrialized farms never see sunlight or even touch ground, they are kept in small tightly confined cages to then be killed and slaughtered, 5000 cows are slaughtered per day so corporations can gain profits.
Grocery stores which are chaings from food corporations tend to push foods that taste or look good to the consumer meaning food with sugars, salts, and fats, these are the general ingredients in products that react with the human body to make you want more salty, fatty, sugary foods. Even fruit grocery stores try to make it look most pleasing to the consumer. In the snacks aisle the chocolate chip cookies were at eye level for customers to see while the saltine crackers were at the bottom. And in the fruits and vegetable sections the fruits had to look shiny, colorful, and appealing.
In Pollan's book, he addresses the point that Americans are easily convinced when dieting. Because we are not educated enough about these things that we face in our everyday lives, we turn to the "experts" who
My initial thought about this question would be that healthy food is what we've been told since we were younger, fruits and vegetables. But according to foodasfood.com, each vitamin, vegetable, fruit, etc. has its advantages and disadvantages. One food can be good for one thing but bad for another. The example used was, a little alcohol will prevent heart attacks but maybe cause breast cancer. We can't know for sure because everyone's body has different reaction to something. From this I concluded that the definition for food that is good for you can vary for different people.
All of this is very messy and choppy because I had trouble organizing my thoughs so I came up with an outline trying to include everything I can use here:
Intro
Argument#1: Industrialization
-->Vroom!...
-->Our Daily Bread (factory examples)
-->"Industrial Food Is Cheap"
Argument#2: Animal Cruelty
-->Meatrix
-->Cows With Guns
Argument#3: Media/Manipulation
-->Grocery Stores
-->Fast Food
-->Pollan vs Colbert
Conclusion
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Food Assignment #8
Within the past week in class we have been watching "Unser Taglich Brot" (our daily bread) and "Vroom! Farming For Kids," discussing where the food we eat comes from. Also shown in "The Meatrix" 1, 2, and 2.5 and the article "Industrial Food is Cheap," the general American way of food is uhealthy and cruel to Animals and plants.
We've seen in "Vroom!..." how farming has been industrialized. Extreme machines are used to pick crops and tend the farm where there is little work for a lot of food meaning lots of profit. Meaning replacing people with machinery used by fossil fuels polluting the air as said in the article "Industrial Food is Cheap." Also stated in this article, because farms tending animals incompetently, the manure (12 million pounds of it) is not being taken care of and is leaking into rivers causing water pollution. This article's main argument is that Industrialized food is NOT cheap because although it is cheap in money, in the long run it affects the planet and all the hormones used affects us Americans who eat the food leading to risk of diseases. And in "Unser Taglich Brot" what is done to animals for our convenience where pigs, chickens, and cows suffer from this immediately, us humans have to face health problems and pollution problems. Whereas, if we eat organic food, although it is expencive money wise, it eliminates the use of chemicals devreasing the risk of diseases which helps us in the long run.
Shown in "The Meatrix" series, the "Family farm is just a fantasy," animals are not being treated like the ideal farm, raising their animals with care. The animals in industrialized farms never see sunlight or even touch ground, they are kept in small tightly confined cages to then be killed and slaughtered, 5000 cows are slaughtered per day which makes me wonder, how much of it do we actually need? before industrialization took over the food system I would assume that people did not have access as much to eat as we have today so how much is actually necessary? Where do we cross the line of producing too much food or not enough?
We've seen in "Vroom!..." how farming has been industrialized. Extreme machines are used to pick crops and tend the farm where there is little work for a lot of food meaning lots of profit. Meaning replacing people with machinery used by fossil fuels polluting the air as said in the article "Industrial Food is Cheap." Also stated in this article, because farms tending animals incompetently, the manure (12 million pounds of it) is not being taken care of and is leaking into rivers causing water pollution. This article's main argument is that Industrialized food is NOT cheap because although it is cheap in money, in the long run it affects the planet and all the hormones used affects us Americans who eat the food leading to risk of diseases. And in "Unser Taglich Brot" what is done to animals for our convenience where pigs, chickens, and cows suffer from this immediately, us humans have to face health problems and pollution problems. Whereas, if we eat organic food, although it is expencive money wise, it eliminates the use of chemicals devreasing the risk of diseases which helps us in the long run.
Shown in "The Meatrix" series, the "Family farm is just a fantasy," animals are not being treated like the ideal farm, raising their animals with care. The animals in industrialized farms never see sunlight or even touch ground, they are kept in small tightly confined cages to then be killed and slaughtered, 5000 cows are slaughtered per day which makes me wonder, how much of it do we actually need? before industrialization took over the food system I would assume that people did not have access as much to eat as we have today so how much is actually necessary? Where do we cross the line of producing too much food or not enough?
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Food Assignment 7
one of my favorite dishes is new england clam chowder from a recipe that my mom got from cooks.com:
1 can 51 oz chopped clams
4 slices hickory smoked bacon, minced
1 onion, finely chopped
2 tbsp flour
4 med potatoes, peeled & diced
3 cups milk or half & half
3 tbsp butter
2 tsp oregano
2 tsp dill
2 tsp dried parsley
2 bay leaves
salt & freshly ground pepper, to taste
Drain clams and reserve juice. In a stock pot, bring clam juice, potatoes, and bay leaves to a boil. Reduce heat and simmer until potatoes are tender.
In a seperate, heavy bottomed kettle, saute bacon, butter, onion, oregano, and parsley over low heat. Do not allow to brown. Add flour to make a roux and continue to cook for several minutes.
Add the hot clam stock through a strainer, a cup at a time, and whisk until smooth. Add the remaining potatoes, clams, and stock and bring to a simmer.
Add the milk or half & half, black pepper, and dill weed and return to a simmer. Add salt, if needed. Serve at once with oyster crackers.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan
In Pollan's book, he addresses the point that Americans are easily convinced when dieting. I think the reasoning is because the not all American are experts on food, so when someone who claims to be an expert says something, most will believe what they say, similar to the bith unit, those of use who are not doctors will assume that everthing the doctor says is best, is the best for you but is really not. Because we are not educated enough about these things that we face in our everyday lives, we turn to the "experts" who tend to generalize for the entire population. When the food expert says this diet is good, I don't think that necessearily means it is good for everyone because everyone has different reactions to different foods so they are forced to generalize for everyone. Similar to doctors, they may not look into every birth case closely so they rely on c-sections as a general overview of how to deal with pregnancies. Most follow the crowd when it comes to food fads. My family pays attention to nutritionists and chefs.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Grocery Store and Habitual Food:
In my house we have a variety of fruits, vegetables, and grains, and nuts that I eat in a typical week.
Fruits: Oranges, mangoes, blueberries, tomato, pepper, peaches, plums, pears, banana
Vegetables: Strawberries, lettuce, cucumber, broccoli, potato, corn, mushrooms
Grains/Roots/Nuts: Beans (black, red, white, lima), white rice, peanuts, macadamia, cashews, almonds, wheat rice, onions
Grocery stores tend to push foods that taste or look good to the consumer meaning food with sugars, salts, and fats, these are the general ingredients in products that people seem to like to eat. Or even fruit that looks most pleasing to the consumer. In the snacks aisle the chocolate chip cookies were at eye level for customers to see while the saltine crackers were at the bottom. And in the fruits and vegetable sections the fruits had to look shiny, colorful, and appealing.
As a child my parents raised me to eat and try a new foods for meals and snacks. Now, since I've had that experience with various foods the way I eat now I am not a very picky eater I have lots of foods that I like or am open to try if I haven't already. Other eating habits I have now that I've noticed is that I don't eat breakfast everyday, I don't think it is because of my habits as a child because when I was younger my parents made sure I would eat breakfast but now that I am responsible for my own breakfast and getting myself to school, I just get lazy and don't make the time to eat breakfast. But I always eat lunch and dinner sometimes with snacks in between because that is how I was raised.
Fruits: Oranges, mangoes, blueberries, tomato, pepper, peaches, plums, pears, banana
Vegetables: Strawberries, lettuce, cucumber, broccoli, potato, corn, mushrooms
Grains/Roots/Nuts: Beans (black, red, white, lima), white rice, peanuts, macadamia, cashews, almonds, wheat rice, onions
Grocery stores tend to push foods that taste or look good to the consumer meaning food with sugars, salts, and fats, these are the general ingredients in products that people seem to like to eat. Or even fruit that looks most pleasing to the consumer. In the snacks aisle the chocolate chip cookies were at eye level for customers to see while the saltine crackers were at the bottom. And in the fruits and vegetable sections the fruits had to look shiny, colorful, and appealing.
As a child my parents raised me to eat and try a new foods for meals and snacks. Now, since I've had that experience with various foods the way I eat now I am not a very picky eater I have lots of foods that I like or am open to try if I haven't already. Other eating habits I have now that I've noticed is that I don't eat breakfast everyday, I don't think it is because of my habits as a child because when I was younger my parents made sure I would eat breakfast but now that I am responsible for my own breakfast and getting myself to school, I just get lazy and don't make the time to eat breakfast. But I always eat lunch and dinner sometimes with snacks in between because that is how I was raised.
Friday, May 1, 2009
May Day
Because May Day is having to do with, socialism, communism, and anarchy, America avoids it entirely. I think it just goes to show how we're so brainwashed to shiver at the thought of communism, frown upon at the idea of socialism or think badly of anarchy when most Americans probably do not even understand the real ideas of socialism, communism, and anarchy because the propaganda tells Americans that communism is evil, or a country like Cuba is evil because it is socialist. Its hard for Americans to think for themselves when their views and influences are one sided.
I think it is interesting how Americans do not celebrate May Day with the rest of the world, the U.S. had to have their own labor day in September as to not associate themselves with socialist/communist/anarchist countries or their enemies. And it is also interesting how the media is completely dissmissive of May Day and the fact that this day benefitted all working class people. It probably is not very surprising because media being run by upper class, against communism because that means less money for them, the benefits to the lower classes has no affect on them.
I think it is interesting how Americans do not celebrate May Day with the rest of the world, the U.S. had to have their own labor day in September as to not associate themselves with socialist/communist/anarchist countries or their enemies. And it is also interesting how the media is completely dissmissive of May Day and the fact that this day benefitted all working class people. It probably is not very surprising because media being run by upper class, against communism because that means less money for them, the benefits to the lower classes has no affect on them.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Food Journal
Tuesday Night:
Steak with A1 steak sauce (eaten with fork and knife)
the steak came from costco, it was frozen then cooked by my mom
Rice, also cooked by my mom in a rice cooker
grapefruit juice
snack: ices/flavor ice
I was doing my history assignment while enjoying this meal.
I'm not lying.
I promise.
This was a good meal
I enjoyed it and I was satisfied after the meal.
Wednesday Morning:
Honey nut cheerios with organic milk. (eaten with bowl and spoon)
I ate this quickly so I wouldn't be late for school.
I wasn't really hungry when I was eating this but I knew I was going to get hungry later so I ate it anyway.
Wednesday Afternoon:
Turkey sandwich with american cheese and mayonnaise from the deli on the corner outside the school (eaten by hand)
Rits bits cheese from the vending machine
Water
Grapefruit juice
I had this meal with fellow juniors in mr. manley's room for our senior committe meeting.
I was not satisfied after eating this meal. I was still a hungry.
Wednesday Evening:
Home made chicken soup (my mom made it)(spoon and bowl)
bread
cheetos
cheese
blueberry nutrigrain bar
water
I ate this with my brothers in the room that we share.
I was fairly satisifed after eating this meal. the tv was on in the background but I wasn't watching it
Steak with A1 steak sauce (eaten with fork and knife)
the steak came from costco, it was frozen then cooked by my mom
Rice, also cooked by my mom in a rice cooker
grapefruit juice
snack: ices/flavor ice
I was doing my history assignment while enjoying this meal.
I'm not lying.
I promise.
This was a good meal
I enjoyed it and I was satisfied after the meal.
Wednesday Morning:
Honey nut cheerios with organic milk. (eaten with bowl and spoon)
I ate this quickly so I wouldn't be late for school.
I wasn't really hungry when I was eating this but I knew I was going to get hungry later so I ate it anyway.
Wednesday Afternoon:
Turkey sandwich with american cheese and mayonnaise from the deli on the corner outside the school (eaten by hand)
Rits bits cheese from the vending machine
Water
Grapefruit juice
I had this meal with fellow juniors in mr. manley's room for our senior committe meeting.
I was not satisfied after eating this meal. I was still a hungry.
Wednesday Evening:
Home made chicken soup (my mom made it)(spoon and bowl)
bread
cheetos
cheese
blueberry nutrigrain bar
water
I ate this with my brothers in the room that we share.
I was fairly satisifed after eating this meal. the tv was on in the background but I wasn't watching it
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Food #3 Home and Corporate
From what i have seen in the media about eating is that it in the United States you can get food fast and easy. Once the food is there and ready to eat i've seen in the media both the idea of togetherness of eating at the table with you family AND where the family is spread throughout the house eating in front of the television. The media also promotes unhealthy food like fast foods but makes it look fresh and healthy and good tasting.
In my family house hold the food is not always cooked quickly. Admittedly we use products that you can make in under 10 mintues like mac and cheese or ramen noodles. But for the most part my parents, who do most of the cooking, take the time to cook what they make.I would say that what is made in my house is mostly of convenience because we don't exactly have all the ingredients growing near by for us to have access to. So we go to the grocery store conveniently close to the house.
We do have a sense of togetherness in the house where we do eat together. We don't eat together all the time and when we don't we do eat in front of the tv with is part of the corporate American way of food. The foods we eat are pretty healthy, my dad likes to eat healthy so he tries not to buy too much junk food so we have I think a pretty good balance between my parent's ways of eating and the American way of eating because the ingredients used are mostly traditional from my family's generations.Overall I think my household has a mix of family traditions of foods from my mom and dad's cultures and the American culture of eating.
In my family house hold the food is not always cooked quickly. Admittedly we use products that you can make in under 10 mintues like mac and cheese or ramen noodles. But for the most part my parents, who do most of the cooking, take the time to cook what they make.I would say that what is made in my house is mostly of convenience because we don't exactly have all the ingredients growing near by for us to have access to. So we go to the grocery store conveniently close to the house.
We do have a sense of togetherness in the house where we do eat together. We don't eat together all the time and when we don't we do eat in front of the tv with is part of the corporate American way of food. The foods we eat are pretty healthy, my dad likes to eat healthy so he tries not to buy too much junk food so we have I think a pretty good balance between my parent's ways of eating and the American way of eating because the ingredients used are mostly traditional from my family's generations.Overall I think my household has a mix of family traditions of foods from my mom and dad's cultures and the American culture of eating.
Monday, April 27, 2009
What's in my Refigerator...?
-Peanut Butter
-Cookie Dough
-Eggs
-Lettuce
-Smoked Sausage
-Coke
-Rice
-Beer
-Mango Nectar
-Milk
-Cranberry Juice
-Tomato Sauce
-Butter
-Cheese
-Ham
This list shows the culture of food how there's two main reasons, one for health, and two for the taste, and sometimes it's both. We have most of the basic food groups in the list and we also have parts that we don't necessarily need but we eat it because it tastes good. Our culture uses food as a way to socialize, or have gatherings such as thanksgiving, dinner parties, brunch gatherings, barbeques, etc..
-Cookie Dough
-Eggs
-Lettuce
-Smoked Sausage
-Coke
-Rice
-Beer
-Mango Nectar
-Milk
-Cranberry Juice
-Tomato Sauce
-Butter
-Cheese
-Ham
This list shows the culture of food how there's two main reasons, one for health, and two for the taste, and sometimes it's both. We have most of the basic food groups in the list and we also have parts that we don't necessarily need but we eat it because it tastes good. Our culture uses food as a way to socialize, or have gatherings such as thanksgiving, dinner parties, brunch gatherings, barbeques, etc..
Food: What is considered Healthy Food?:
My initial thought about this question would be that healthy food is what we've been told since we were younger, fruits and vegetables. But according to foodasfood.com, each vitamin, vegetable, fruit, etc. has its advantages and disadvantages. One food can be good for one thing but bad for another. The example used was, a little alcohol will prevent heart attacks but maybe cause breast cancer. We can't know for sure because everyone's body has different reaction to something. From this I concluded that the definition for food that is good for you can vary for different people.
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Poverty in the US vs Poverty in other countries
One main aspect of poverty in America we have looked at is the health care system in America and how it contrasts with other countries, more specifically looking at Canada, France, and England. The health care system has its benefits in Canada and France that contrast with the American health care system.
Michael Moore's SiCKO is a movie about those in Ameirca who have health insurance. It basically talks about how the insurance companies try to get as much money out of citizens as they can. And they compare this to other countries. In America, doctors are paid more if they deny care to patients from the insurance company to cover because they are saving the insurance company's money. While in England, the doctors get paid the more they convince their patients to stop smoking, the more they actually help their patients. It is also shows in statistics that people in England will live longer and are healthier than Americans due to the health care difference in both countries. They say the poorest person in England will live longer than the richest person in America.
SiCKO shows a case where a man needed surgery in order to save his life, all he had to do was get the surgery approved by the hospital. But because the insurance companies need to deny services to save their money, the doctor had to deny this service which caused his death. Another case where an American woman had to pretend she was related to a canadian man so she would be able to get free health care in Canada.
The movie also compares how America is a really stressful country where there's barely a break, school for the first 20some years of our life, get a job with might not cover all your needs causing more stress, and because you are stressed you need to buy antidepressants and then you're thousands of dolllars in debt. In France, after a man was treated, the doctor asked him if he was ready for another job and he was able to take three months off from work while still getting money (and remember he doesnt have to pay for his visit to the hospital or the ride he took to get there) and relax before he starts working again.
I spoke to my father about his experience with health care in America. His experiences were not as upsetting as the ones shown in the movie but there were cases where he did have to pay heavy medical bills because the insuance company did not cover it. But after he has my brothers and I, we joined child health plus which is a care center managed by Fidelis and since then it has covered the three trips to the emergency room and any other times we needed to go to the hospital for anything. In my family we never had to pay for anything major because the insurance did not cover it. In general my father said he had a pretty good experience with medical care here in America, his only complaint was that they make you wait a long time to get whatever you need, Similar to Canada where people were complaining about the how long they have to wait to get their care. (cbc.ca)
From what I see is that our family, because nothing major has happened to us that we would depend on the insurance company to cover any expences, its okay if we pay for a few things here and there and its really all that we know, it was such a surprise to myself and the rest of the class to see how in other countries they can just walk in and out of the hospital with no worries about the medical bill and how the expenses are being paid for. And it's such a surprise to me how the insurance companites can put a price on your own health and that price and make you or break you in a very litteral sense.
When sharing our personal experiences with the class, one of the students (Lauren 4/20) explained how one of her family memebers was denied care and was upset about it but did not want to show it as did another student, Binta. We noticed that we did not express our anger freely because we simply concluded that there was nothing we could do about it. This came up in SiCKO where a French man explained the the French government is afriad of the people because they have the power to protest and get free medical care. But in the United States people are afraid of the government because in the case of medical care they control the treatments you get and the care you get, and just your well being overall. Because they have this control we just accept that there's nothing we can do about it.
Michael Moore's SiCKO is a movie about those in Ameirca who have health insurance. It basically talks about how the insurance companies try to get as much money out of citizens as they can. And they compare this to other countries. In America, doctors are paid more if they deny care to patients from the insurance company to cover because they are saving the insurance company's money. While in England, the doctors get paid the more they convince their patients to stop smoking, the more they actually help their patients. It is also shows in statistics that people in England will live longer and are healthier than Americans due to the health care difference in both countries. They say the poorest person in England will live longer than the richest person in America.
SiCKO shows a case where a man needed surgery in order to save his life, all he had to do was get the surgery approved by the hospital. But because the insurance companies need to deny services to save their money, the doctor had to deny this service which caused his death. Another case where an American woman had to pretend she was related to a canadian man so she would be able to get free health care in Canada.
The movie also compares how America is a really stressful country where there's barely a break, school for the first 20some years of our life, get a job with might not cover all your needs causing more stress, and because you are stressed you need to buy antidepressants and then you're thousands of dolllars in debt. In France, after a man was treated, the doctor asked him if he was ready for another job and he was able to take three months off from work while still getting money (and remember he doesnt have to pay for his visit to the hospital or the ride he took to get there) and relax before he starts working again.
I spoke to my father about his experience with health care in America. His experiences were not as upsetting as the ones shown in the movie but there were cases where he did have to pay heavy medical bills because the insuance company did not cover it. But after he has my brothers and I, we joined child health plus which is a care center managed by Fidelis and since then it has covered the three trips to the emergency room and any other times we needed to go to the hospital for anything. In my family we never had to pay for anything major because the insurance did not cover it. In general my father said he had a pretty good experience with medical care here in America, his only complaint was that they make you wait a long time to get whatever you need, Similar to Canada where people were complaining about the how long they have to wait to get their care. (cbc.ca)
From what I see is that our family, because nothing major has happened to us that we would depend on the insurance company to cover any expences, its okay if we pay for a few things here and there and its really all that we know, it was such a surprise to myself and the rest of the class to see how in other countries they can just walk in and out of the hospital with no worries about the medical bill and how the expenses are being paid for. And it's such a surprise to me how the insurance companites can put a price on your own health and that price and make you or break you in a very litteral sense.
When sharing our personal experiences with the class, one of the students (Lauren 4/20) explained how one of her family memebers was denied care and was upset about it but did not want to show it as did another student, Binta. We noticed that we did not express our anger freely because we simply concluded that there was nothing we could do about it. This came up in SiCKO where a French man explained the the French government is afriad of the people because they have the power to protest and get free medical care. But in the United States people are afraid of the government because in the case of medical care they control the treatments you get and the care you get, and just your well being overall. Because they have this control we just accept that there's nothing we can do about it.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Was Michael Moore Lying about...?
In the movie SiCKO, Michael Moore stated that Cuba's life expectancy rate is higher than America's
according to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy) Cuba is #37 on the list of life expectancy and America is #38
The movie also gave viewers the idea that Canadians are happy with their health care
according to http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2002/07/15/healthcare020715.html 80% of Canadians are happy with their health care but the 20% who are not happy with their health care say they have a long wait causing added stress, anxiety, and pain, similar to the American health care system (from what myself and my family have experienced), there is a long wait to get the care you need. But contrasting with the Canadian health care system, Americans worrying about the medical bill and the insurance companies most likely also add to the stress and anxiety.
according to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy) Cuba is #37 on the list of life expectancy and America is #38
The movie also gave viewers the idea that Canadians are happy with their health care
according to http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2002/07/15/healthcare020715.html 80% of Canadians are happy with their health care but the 20% who are not happy with their health care say they have a long wait causing added stress, anxiety, and pain, similar to the American health care system (from what myself and my family have experienced), there is a long wait to get the care you need. But contrasting with the Canadian health care system, Americans worrying about the medical bill and the insurance companies most likely also add to the stress and anxiety.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Family Experience With Health Care in The U.S.
Michael Moore's SiCKO is a movie about those in Ameirca who have health insurance. It basically talks about how the insurance companies try to get as much money out of citizens as they can. And they compare this to other countries. In America, doctors are paid more if they deny care to patients from the insurance company to cover because they are saving the insurance company's money. While in England, the doctors get paid the more they convince their patients to stop smoking, the more they actually help their patients. It is also shows in statistics that people in England will live longer and are healthier than Americans due to the health care difference in both countries. They say the poorest person in England will live longer than the richest person in America.
SiCKO shows a case where a man needed surgery in order to save his life, all he had to do was get the surgery approved by the hospital. But because the insurance companies need to deny services to save their money, the doctor had to deny this service which caused his death. Another case where an American woman had to pretend she was related to a canadian man so she would be able to get free health care in Canada.
The movie also compares how America is a really stressful country where there's barely a break, school for the first 20some years of our life, get a job with might not cover all your needs causing more stress, and because you are stressed you need to buy antidepressants and then you're thousands of dolllars in debt. In France, after a man was treated, the doctor asked him if he was ready for another job and he was able to take three months off from work while still getting money (and remember he doesnt have to pay for his visit to the hospital or the ride he took to get there) and relax before he starts working again.
I spoke to my father about his experience with health care in America. His experiences were not as upsetting as the ones shown in the movie but there were cases where he did have to pay heavy medical bills because the insuance company did not cover it. But after he has my brothers and I, we joined child health plus which is a care center managed by Fidelis and since then it has covered the three trips to the emergency room and any other times we needed to go to the hospital for anything. In my family we never had to pay for anything major because the insurance did not cover it. In general my father said he had a pretty good experience with medical care here in America, his only complaint was that they make you wait a long time to get whatever you need, I'm not sure how that is compared to other countries, if they have long waits as well.
From what I see is that our family, because nothing major has happened to us that we would depend on the insurance company to cover any expences, its okay if we pay for a few things here and there and its really all that we know, it was such a surprise to myself and the rest of the class to see how in other countries they can just walk in and out of the hospital with no worries about the medical bill and how the expenses are being paid for. And it's such a surprise to me how the insurance companites can put a price on your own health and that price and make you or break you in a very litteral sense.
SiCKO shows a case where a man needed surgery in order to save his life, all he had to do was get the surgery approved by the hospital. But because the insurance companies need to deny services to save their money, the doctor had to deny this service which caused his death. Another case where an American woman had to pretend she was related to a canadian man so she would be able to get free health care in Canada.
The movie also compares how America is a really stressful country where there's barely a break, school for the first 20some years of our life, get a job with might not cover all your needs causing more stress, and because you are stressed you need to buy antidepressants and then you're thousands of dolllars in debt. In France, after a man was treated, the doctor asked him if he was ready for another job and he was able to take three months off from work while still getting money (and remember he doesnt have to pay for his visit to the hospital or the ride he took to get there) and relax before he starts working again.
I spoke to my father about his experience with health care in America. His experiences were not as upsetting as the ones shown in the movie but there were cases where he did have to pay heavy medical bills because the insuance company did not cover it. But after he has my brothers and I, we joined child health plus which is a care center managed by Fidelis and since then it has covered the three trips to the emergency room and any other times we needed to go to the hospital for anything. In my family we never had to pay for anything major because the insurance did not cover it. In general my father said he had a pretty good experience with medical care here in America, his only complaint was that they make you wait a long time to get whatever you need, I'm not sure how that is compared to other countries, if they have long waits as well.
From what I see is that our family, because nothing major has happened to us that we would depend on the insurance company to cover any expences, its okay if we pay for a few things here and there and its really all that we know, it was such a surprise to myself and the rest of the class to see how in other countries they can just walk in and out of the hospital with no worries about the medical bill and how the expenses are being paid for. And it's such a surprise to me how the insurance companites can put a price on your own health and that price and make you or break you in a very litteral sense.
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Research and Notes From The Past Week
What are the main causes for poverty in the world?
"The causes are numerous, including a lack of individual responsibility, bad government policy, exploitation by people and businesses with power and influence, or some combination of these and other factors." http://www.globalissues.org/issue/2/causes-of-poverty
On Tuesday March 31st, we played musical chairs in class. This demonstration expressed the idea of competition for jobs or opportunities. When you play musical chairs there is always less amount of chairs than people, reflecting poverty because there are only so many slots that will get you a good job in America and there are not enough opportunities for everyone forcing people to be poor. Based on musical chairs we concluded that the reason poor people are poor is because there are not enough opportunities for everyone in society.
On Thursday April 2nd, to show how the rich own most of the wealth, there was a demonstration with ten chairs. one person would occupuy about five chairs(17.5%), that would be the rich owning more than their fair share. And gradually going down to where four people need to share half of a chair representing that the poor own very little of the wealth(2.2%).
Finally, on Friday the third we play musical chairs with a variation, where a couple of people would own chairs, representing the rich because they have more opportunities than they need and towards the end of the game there were only a couple chairs without names, so 4 people would have to fight for those couple chairs while there were several other ones that people owned but were untouchable. Overall, covering the three activities, the main reasons why poor people are poor is because there are not enough opportunities in the world and people the rich are occupying the opportunities and the wealth.
"The causes are numerous, including a lack of individual responsibility, bad government policy, exploitation by people and businesses with power and influence, or some combination of these and other factors." http://www.globalissues.org/issue/2/causes-of-poverty
On Tuesday March 31st, we played musical chairs in class. This demonstration expressed the idea of competition for jobs or opportunities. When you play musical chairs there is always less amount of chairs than people, reflecting poverty because there are only so many slots that will get you a good job in America and there are not enough opportunities for everyone forcing people to be poor. Based on musical chairs we concluded that the reason poor people are poor is because there are not enough opportunities for everyone in society.
On Thursday April 2nd, to show how the rich own most of the wealth, there was a demonstration with ten chairs. one person would occupuy about five chairs(17.5%), that would be the rich owning more than their fair share. And gradually going down to where four people need to share half of a chair representing that the poor own very little of the wealth(2.2%).
Finally, on Friday the third we play musical chairs with a variation, where a couple of people would own chairs, representing the rich because they have more opportunities than they need and towards the end of the game there were only a couple chairs without names, so 4 people would have to fight for those couple chairs while there were several other ones that people owned but were untouchable. Overall, covering the three activities, the main reasons why poor people are poor is because there are not enough opportunities in the world and people the rich are occupying the opportunities and the wealth.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Wealth and Poverty in the U.S.-Internet Research
Questions:
Who creates the tax and income regulations?
According to wikipedia, he poverty line is set by the government
How is the poverty line determined?
What would it take for these regulations to change?
Where in America is the highest poverty rate?
What are the main causes for poverty in America?
What are the main causes for poverty in the world?
"The causes are numerous, including a lack of individual responsibility, bad government policy, exploitation by people and businesses with power and influence, or some combination of these and other factors." http://www.globalissues.org/issue/2/causes-of-poverty
How do America's standards regarding welfare, income, taxes, and poverty compare to other countries? (Wikipedia)
Who creates the tax and income regulations?
According to wikipedia, he poverty line is set by the government
How is the poverty line determined?
What would it take for these regulations to change?
Where in America is the highest poverty rate?
What are the main causes for poverty in America?
What are the main causes for poverty in the world?
"The causes are numerous, including a lack of individual responsibility, bad government policy, exploitation by people and businesses with power and influence, or some combination of these and other factors." http://www.globalissues.org/issue/2/causes-of-poverty
How do America's standards regarding welfare, income, taxes, and poverty compare to other countries? (Wikipedia)
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Danish Assignment
If you calculate the minimum amount of money necessary for a woman living in a rented apartment in brooklyn named Jill who has a girl who is 3 years old and has another baby on the way to survive you'll roughly find that she needs $29,436 a year. The official income of a family of two that is recognized as poor it $1400, if Jill earns less than this she can get help from the government. So it turns out to be that the actual poverty line is nearly two times less than necessary. At this point, Jill is "unworthy" of welfare. (A person worthy of welface is someone who is making an effort to support themselves but needs a hand up not out as long as they make below the poverty line). But Jill she can use the universal welfare such as public schools but she would not get targeted help from the government. If Jill were poor she could also recieve charity which is out of pitty or she can get help in solidarity, workin gotgether with those who are in the same situation where they share the same benefits.
No matter where Jill is living, needs to pay taxes. There's the flat tax, regressive tax, and progressive tax. The flat tax is where everyone pays the same percent where the poor pays more than the rich. The regressive tax is where the poor has a higher percentage of income tax while the rich has a lower percentage like a sales tax for example, favoring the top of the social ladder. Progressive is the opposite where the rich pay more than the poor. And finally, an effective tax includes all taxes once they are calculated.
contrasting with the danish welfare system, they have higher taxes but they have free health care and free day care. They also have unemployment beneits where if you are without a job, you get money from the government for four years, then a two year break where you are forced to look for a job, there are circumstances for each situation. Because of all these regulations for the majority of the time you are never without a job and it is very difficult to be poor. "Get poor or die trying" as a Danish student described it as.
I think that it might be a good idea for America to adopt the Danish model and become a Social Democracy because I would think that it would decrease the amount of poor people in America but I think it is too early to decide, I think it would be best to decide after seeing all of the pros and cons to a Social Democracy but as of right now, I think it would be a good idea.
No matter where Jill is living, needs to pay taxes. There's the flat tax, regressive tax, and progressive tax. The flat tax is where everyone pays the same percent where the poor pays more than the rich. The regressive tax is where the poor has a higher percentage of income tax while the rich has a lower percentage like a sales tax for example, favoring the top of the social ladder. Progressive is the opposite where the rich pay more than the poor. And finally, an effective tax includes all taxes once they are calculated.
contrasting with the danish welfare system, they have higher taxes but they have free health care and free day care. They also have unemployment beneits where if you are without a job, you get money from the government for four years, then a two year break where you are forced to look for a job, there are circumstances for each situation. Because of all these regulations for the majority of the time you are never without a job and it is very difficult to be poor. "Get poor or die trying" as a Danish student described it as.
I think that it might be a good idea for America to adopt the Danish model and become a Social Democracy because I would think that it would decrease the amount of poor people in America but I think it is too early to decide, I think it would be best to decide after seeing all of the pros and cons to a Social Democracy but as of right now, I think it would be a good idea.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)